When I shifted from writing poetry to writing stories, I thought—a rookie thought—that I’d just be able to do it. It was around 1980 and minimalism was coming into style, and I tried to write spare stories where each sentence throbbed with meaning. I did this for a couple of years and not only were the results awful, the practice was too. Zillions of crossouts. I could write an entire page and end up with a series of black lines and no kept words.
Finally, I stopped the madness. I decided that for the next however long I would just read, do what is now called close reading, and make an effort to catch the moments in books and stories when things happened. Above all, I wanted to learn how a plot worked, and where it lurked on the pages. As a regular reader I was usually so absorbed that I blew right past it. As this new kind of reader I was hunting for specific spots where I could see plot happening.
After a while I became more systematic about this project and choose 5 authors to study whose work I felt an affinity for and who I felt I could learn from. These were Jane Bowles, Edith Wharton, Flannery O’ Connor, F. Scott Fitzgerald, and Virginia Woolf. Now I think this is an odd list, as three of these authors are notable stylists, and I was looking for brass tacks. (I augmented with Steven King and Danielle Steele to really see plot at work.) I tried to read everything they had published, which offered a lesson I hadn’t expected—not all their work was of the same quality. Even the greatest were not great sometimes. Fitzgerald published dozens of stories but only a few are collected as his greatest hits. It was wonderful to see this, as it taught me that greatness comes of both practice and serendipity (what doesn’t?) and that what isn’t genius has value, too, for the sensibility and voice of the author. Many of these writers “lesser” works are my favorites.
I did figure things out from doing this reading and also by reading books about writing. My favorite was Flannery’s Mystery and Manners. That book became my crucible. I was determined to understand what she was talking about and to keep rereading until I did. (It took years.) The reading and analyzing project took two years of immersion before I was ready to start writing again. I did figure things out, or began to. I do still recommend this method as the best way to learn how to write. I don’t think it’s enough just to read though. Instead, try this:
ask questions of the text. My questions might be different than your questions, but as an example they might be along the lines of:
what happens in the beginning? how is the story set up? what is the tone? where I am, the reader, in relation to the text? what is the writer offering me to worry and wonder about? what is the protagonist like? how am I enjoined to care about their dilemma? what are they after, and why is it so hard for them to get what they want? is there an aspect of their personality that gets in their way? where are the plot turns and what do they look like? what happens at the end? how is the story resolved?
underline the sentences that answer your questions.
write about what you notice. this is crucial. articulate what you see and how it is working. write a letter to yourself, write a letter to a friend, share the information in language. write about how a story works as if doing so makes all the difference between learning to write or not. do this again and again until you metabolize how stories work and can be free when drafting, then also have a set of tools to work with for revision.
I unearthed a set of plot points I work with that are fluid but present in all stories that don’t aim to defy the universal let me tell you a story shape. As I have read books about writing (I love them) I see those same points mentioned in similar language. They are right there, visible to the naked eye. Not only the plot; there are repeated images, words, symbols, titles, and metaphors to notice and explore in writing. And what about meaning? How is meaning made? It’s a different practice to underline and annotate for pithy quotes and moving moments than it is to underline and annotate for how a story is put together. It’s my idea of a good time. Please let me know if this is a practice of yours as well. I will do a deeper dive into this subject when I go on sabbatical next spring.
On another note, I am going to be doing some writing and engaging in a conversation about the TV show Girls with the brilliant author Lynn Steger Strong here on this stack over the next weeks. We both love the show and are rewatching it as ballast against the influx of terrible news everyday. I also have a few writing posts coming up, such as what I learned about writing from the Beatles, so stayed tuned.
Right now I hear both cars and birds. Can spring be far behind?
This is exactly what I was looking for! I’m currently studying the short story form with a marvelous teacher through Santa Monica College (our text is The Penguin Book of the American Short Story edited by John Freeman) and am blown away by how much I’m learning about how these splendid stories work. But how, I was wondering, could I approach that level of understanding of the novel, and plot specifically, as I continue work on my own book. And here it is! I couldn’t ask for finer. Thank you (again), Alice!
Oh my God, Alice, I just this second realized a deep dive into Girls is so what I need to do as a reprieve from, you know, the shitshow. I remain in your thrall.